Skip to content

Minor fix for signedness of asuint bitcast #7623

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Minor fix for signedness of asuint bitcast #7623

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

petermcneeleychromium
Copy link

The Result of a bitcast via 'asuint' should be unsigned.

Code that will (incorrectly) generate an assert.

RWByteAddressBuffer v : register(u0);
void foo() {
  int v_1 = int(0);
  v.InterlockedAdd(int(16u), asint((asuint(int(0)) - asuint(int(123)))), v_1);
  int x = v_1;
}

Failing code (6199) '/dxc/tools/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp'

  assert(SI.isSigned() == E->getType()->isSignedIntegerOrEnumerationType() &&
           "Invalid evaluation result.");

@dneto0 dneto0 self-requested a review July 4, 2025 14:32
@dneto0 dneto0 requested a review from s-perron July 4, 2025 14:47
s-perron
s-perron reviewed Jul 4, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@s-perron s-perron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You might want to add a test to https://github.com/microsoft/DirectXShaderCompiler/tree/4fcf67f78f7d6ffd286316112694a3ae000860e2/tools/clang/test/SemaHLSL. That checks the AST has the correct type.

@s-perron s-perron requested a review from llvm-beanz July 4, 2025 18:39
@s-perron
Copy link
Collaborator

s-perron commented Jul 4, 2025

/AzurePipelines run

@azure-pipelines Azure Pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@s-perron s-perron requested a review from damyanp July 4, 2025 18:40
@s-perron
Copy link
Collaborator

Ping @llvm-beanz @damyanp

@petermcneeleychromium
Copy link
Author

ping on this change. It is quite small change.

@damyanp
Copy link
Member

damyanp commented Sep 3, 2025

I'll have to defer details of a review to someone more familiar with this code, but as s-perron mentioned above, there should be an associated test to go along with this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@s-perron s-perron s-perron left review comments

@dneto0 dneto0 dneto0 approved these changes

@llvm-beanz llvm-beanz Awaiting requested review from llvm-beanz

@damyanp damyanp Awaiting requested review from damyanp

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
HLSL Roadmap
Status: New
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@petermcneeleychromium @s-perron @damyanp @dneto0